Thursday, October 31, 2013

The Burning of Lucy, A Choctaw Slave




Who was Lucy?
Not much is really known about Lucy. She was simply a Black woman enslaved in the Choctaw Nation.

The few facts that are known about her, are that she was the mother of eight children, and she was allowed as were other slaves, to worship at the local Presbyterian Church of their Choctaw Masters. And she was said to have been a member in good standing in the church. (This was also the church attended by noted leader Cyrus Byington who created the Choctaw dictionary.)

In 1858 an incident took place involving one of the slaves of Robert Harkins, a leading Choctaw leader who also held her as a slave. A confrontation had occurred between Harkins and a male slave called Prince. The confrontation ended with Harkins, the slave holder being killed.

For several days Harkins was simply missing, but then his absence was noted, and inquiries began. The male slave was confronted and at first denied any knowledge, but eventually admitted to the slaying of Harkins. During his confession he also stated that Lucy was involved and had planned the killing.

Lucy denied this vehemently and it is stated that much evidence was revealed that proved that she was not involved. However, Indian Territory and the Choctaw Nation were slave country. Harkins widow Lavina, wanted revenge for husband's death, But the slave who admitted to killing Harkins, then committed suicide, so there was no guilty party to execute. But Lavenia, the grieving widow, demanded that someone pay for the death of her husband.

The culture of Slave America prevailed and in spite of Lucy's vehement denials and arising doubts of any guilt, Lucy was sentenced to death. The decision was, that a black life had to pay for the death of Harkins. It was decided that she would be executed and the most cruel method was selected---she was to be burned alive!  She was to be burned along with the body of the now deceased slave Prince, who had admitted to the killing. Southern sentiments towards black life prevailed  in Lucy's case, and this is one of the earliest incidents were the culture of "lynching-as-entertainment" was recorded.

Word spread quickly throughout the Territory--a slave woman was going to be burned alive. No outrage was expressed, and nothing was done to prevent her demise, and in fact curiosity was aroused. The burning of Lucy was going to be entertainment, and people from many miles around were said to have packed up the family to come and watch Lucy burn. Her death was simply entertainment.

So the burning of this poor Black woman, was destined to become entertainment. Sadly "lynching as entertainment" would spread throughout the south and lynching culture prevailed till the middle of the 20th century. Such events would occur, without prosecution, and the lives of those with roots in a slave environment would pay the price of simply living.

Aftermath in the Community
Not much more was known of this story--Lavina the grieving widow in the Presbyterian church kept her good standing with the church. Because of the ties to the Presbyterian church, and the involvement of many affiliated church leaders, with the people involved,  the story of the Burning of Lucy was kept hidden for over a year from Presbyterians leaders, who had missions well established in the Choctaw Nation. It was feared that had church leaders learned of the Slave burning involving prominent members of their mission in Choctaw country, that many of their efforts may have been jeopardized.

Sadly, for many reasons, Lucy, and her tragic end have been erased, almost entirely from the pages of Indian Territory history, Choctaw History, Oklahoma history and American history.

But the impact of the burning of this woman had to have reached the lives of the enslaved people in Choctaw Country.

My gr. grandparents and their loved ones were among those enslaved in Choctaw country.
Did they know Lucy?
Or had they heard of her?
Did they have to watch her execution?
Did they have to weep in silence as one of them was lead unfairly to a painful death?
Or did the story come to them via the slave communication network?

The answers will never be known---but Lucy--whose children were most likely scattered and divided among other slaves, deserves to have her story told and to have her name called. It is said that she spoke of her innocence till her last breath.

Nevertheless, she paid the price, paid by so many for simply having lived, been enslaved and accused.

May Lucy's spirit be free, and may there be joy somewhere for her descendants whoever they are and wherever they may be.

More information:
Further reading about this incident can be found in the following works:

William McLoughlin, "The Choctaw Slave Burning": A Crisis in Mission Work Among the Indians. Journal of the West (no. 13), 1974, 114-115

Master's Thesis:
Fortney, Jeffrey L. Jr. Slaves and Slaveholders in the Choctaw Nation 1830-1866. Denton Texas
Digital Library 

7 comments:

  1. This is a very powerful read...so let me get this right? They lynched an innocent woman for entertainment? A man-the guilty culprit-confessed his guilt and a lie-the lie being Lucy was his partner in Harkins murder? Considering this time in history (1858) could it be that Lucy, who was a slave as was Prince, was being raped by Harkins? And that Prince in his defending Lucy from such a horrible act-killed Harkins? Maybe that was her only guilt-according to this period in time- she being a human being-a woman-a slave-property-her "guilt" allowed her death to be entertainment-SMH. To make matters worse-he then committed suicide?-bless his heart-bless them both and their descendants...wow... I wonder why he confessed Lucy as an accessory to his crime. As far as the church is concerned-I wonder why they would think to keep all information about her hidden. The stigma associated with Lucy's death and her church attendance are different in their assessment of her and whether or not she actually committed any crime. Unless, they were involved in her lynching-and felt it necessary to keep their association hidden? After all her attendance proved she was a spiritual woman, right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is quite a bit of conjecture here. I've looked pretty extensively into the Choctaw slave-burning episode and there are a few other things worth noting. First of all, Prince's suicide is suspect. I fully believe that he would want to chose suicide when facing the alternative (Lucy's fate), but am skeptical about a person's ability to drowned themselves without premeditation or assistance. Beyond that, I've never heard of any accusations that Harkins was raping Lucy--plus, Lucy is normally referred to as on the older side (not that this necessarily rules it out).
      Another thought is on the entertainment aspect. Choctaw historian Donna Akers places this event in a much traditional Choctaw revenge model in her book "Living in the Land of Death". Given that Lavina Harkins nee. Pitchlynn's unique heritage, it is open to speculation exactly what part of this was more Choctaw and what part was more Southern.
      Finally, this did cause quite the uproar once it became known. Northern missionaries in the ABCFM cut ties with their missionaries to the Choctaws and the event was reported all the way in England. If not for its close timing with the Civil War, it probably would have made a bigger splash.

      PS. Oh, and in regards to your last question KaSandra, Lavina was also a member of the same church. Cyrus Byington mentions that she was forced to make a public confession of everything that she had done, and also blames some of the "wicked men" in Lavina's family for the terrible act, which is how he condemned it while letting Lavina back in at the same time.
      Would love to talk about this more, if anyone would like to: JFortney@OU.edu

      Delete
  2. KaShandra,
    Thanks for your comments. I have not seen much to support that there was a relationship between Lucy and Harkins. I am not saying that it did not occur, but simply saying that I don't know that much about it to make the statement, and the pieces that I have read, do not address it.

    Of course there are many things that can lead to an emotional confrontation that could result in someone's death.

    1) Self defense. Slave holders, and overseers had complete rule over the body of their enslaved victims. Slight infractions perceived or real could be addressed harshly and violently.

    2) Sale of a loved on. The sale of a spouse, or child, or parent, could lead to such emotion>

    3) A severe whipping (usually metered on the bare back) could leave a profound impact on those required to observe it, in addition to the hapless sould receiving the blows. Such beating were often followed by salt being put on the wounds after such lashings>

    The nature of slavery simply horrible---and unless there are other details about what led to Harkins death, we may never know.

    The "entertainmen" lyncing culture prevailed in the south for decades. A simple Google search will reveal graphic images of people of all ages posing with the remains of lynching victims. In the case of Lucy--she was executed and not lynched--but the part of her death that was basically a public spectacle was what I was referring to. In other words the act of watching another die and the "entertainment" of such events was the reference I was making.

    ReplyDelete
  3. KaShandra,
    Thanks for your comments. I have not seen much to support that there was a relationship between Lucy and Harkins. I am not saying that it did not occur, but simply saying that I don't know that much about it to make the statement, and the pieces that I have read, do not address it.

    Of course there are many things that can lead to an emotional confrontation that could result in someone's death.

    1) Self defense. Slave holders, and overseers had complete rule over the body of their enslaved victims. Slight infractions perceived or real could be addressed harshly and violently.

    2) Sale of a loved on. The sale of a spouse, or child, or parent, could lead to such emotion>

    3) A severe whipping (usually metered on the bare back) could leave a profound impact on those required to observe it, in addition to the hapless sould receiving the blows. Such beating were often followed by salt being put on the wounds after such lashings>

    The nature of slavery simply horrible---and unless there are other details about what led to Harkins death, we may never know.

    The "entertainmen" lyncing culture prevailed in the south for decades. A simple Google search will reveal graphic images of people of all ages posing with the remains of lynching victims. In the case of Lucy--she was executed and not lynched--but the part of her death that was basically a public spectacle was what I was referring to. In other words the act of watching another die and the "entertainment" of such events was the reference I was making.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mr. Fortney,

    Thank you for visiting the blog and also for your research into the story of Lucy and for including it in your thesis.

    Many of us with ties to the Choctaw Nation enslaved, have wanted to see more about the history and nature of slavery in Choctaw country.
    The fact that you are undertaking such a study is encouraging as many of us connected to those once enslaved in the Territory, have hoped that a scholarly approach study would someday be made regarding Choctaw slaves.

    I shall be in touch with you in the future to learn more about your work. I hope to hear that perhaps slavery from the perspective of those of Robert Jones will be explored as well as the larger slave holders also.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I recently learned of this horrid incident when I stumbled upon a book by Barbara Krauthamer. It was a portion of the account since I was looking at only an excerpt of her book online. But I happened to see my 4th great-grandfather (Solomon Pitchlynn) mentioned in the part I did read. When I obtained the full journal article from a local university near me, I could not believe what I was reading. My heart broke for Lucy's 8 children, who in all likelihood were witnesses to the lynching of their mother. It also broke my heart to know that some of the ancestor of my mother's maternal line were enslaved by Peter Pitchlynn and his seemingly awful family. I only recently found the enrollment cards and packets on Solomon Pithclynn's descendants, though I always knew that oral family history spoke of our connection to the Choctaw nation. When I found this information last month, I learned about the slave-owning Pitchlynns. The more I learn about those people, the more disgust builds in my heart. Learning of Prince and Lucy's fate did not help matters. Nevertheless, I thank you both, Mr. Fortney and Ms. Walton-Raji, for your work in the area of slavery in the Choctaw Nation and Choctaw Freedmen. Mr. Fortney, your thesis was insightful and it's refreshing to see scholarly research on what has been a largely ignored chapter of American history. I am also grateful for your website, Ms. Walton-Raji, that I found from the recommendation of Dr. Krauthamer. With resources available from experts like the two of you, I will continue to press on with the genealogy research of my family...such a bittersweet journey.

    Blessings,
    Kimya
    kimya_s76@att.net

    ReplyDelete